1 |
Intention of the ‘A Fairer Brighton & Hove Disadvantage Strategy Framework’ and reflections on the definition of disadvantage
There is a significant amount of work happening across the city which supports children, young people and families at risk of disadvantage.
The purpose of this framework is to: · Provide a collated view of that work & support in its delivery · Provide insights to its impact across the city · Provide a platform for holistic understanding of issues for families and collaborative problem solving · Provide guiding principles that should be at the heart of all the work we do with and for families at risk of disadvantage
This framework can be used as a critical friend, helping to drive work in the city forward.
A set of guiding principles have been developed from direct feedback from our communities and these should inform work we plan, deliver and review with families at risk of disadvantage. These principles can continue to develop during the lifespan of this framework as we strive to capture more of our communities' voice, to better understand their needs and experiences.
|
Achieving a city definition of what we mean by ’being at risk of disadvantage’ There are many ways of describing or understanding how a child, young person or family may be at risk of disadvantage. These will vary greatly depending on factors such as: age; race; gender; whether they are disabled or have additional needs; whether they have a low income or have worklessness at home; whether they are care experienced; where they live in the city and what type of services they need and use.
During the lifespan of this framework, we want to: · Develop a citywide understanding of what ‘being at risk of disadvantage’ can mean in Brighton & Hove · Share more understanding on what services, commissioners and leaders need to be doing more of to tackle it and to remove barriers.
It is important to highlight, that there is a recognition that children and families may be at multiple risk of disadvantage, and that this further compounds their likelihood of poorer outcomes than others in the city.
One of the guiding principles emphasises the need to be clear, that the responsibility for fixing the ‘problem of disadvantage’ does not solely sit with those that are at risk of it. Being at risk of disadvantage is not a fault or deficit of the individual or a family concerned, but a reflection on the barriers placed by society and systems. Recognising and addressing this is a key element of this framework.
We need to acknowledge the intersectionality in individuals and families and the many strengths these bring, but also recognise how those very characteristics or experiences may lead to a multitude of barriers which compound the risk of disadvantage.
“This should not be a deficit model. Strategies, programmes and interventions should recognise the strengths of those who they are responding to” Quote from a family March 2022.
|
2 |
What families and frontline services tell us
We asked communities what works well for them, what they think about being at risk of disadvantage and what should be done to better support them. The feedback directly informed the creation of this framework, especially the guiding principles in the next section. Here are some of the comments we received.
3 |
The guiding principles
Feedback from communities, from the Early Help Review and learning from existing strategies and programmes, which support families at risk of disadvantage, helped inform the development of these guiding principles. We want all to adopt these when working with children, young people or families in the city who may be at risk of disadvantage. During the lifespan of this framework, we want to continue to develop these.
· It is not the sole responsibility of those at risk of disadvantage to solve the problems they face · Give communities the right support and decision-making roles for matters that affects them · Community experience and needs must be at the heart of service design · Communities must be included and feel respected and trusted – we must position service users as one of the experts round the table
· Our work and how we approach it must be trauma informed · An individual or communities’ lived experiences are valued · We must better understand and recognise the range of ways someone may be at risk of disadvantage and how the negative impact can be compounded by multiple factors · People described as ‘disadvantaged’ can feel stigmatised and ‘done to’ and it can also exclude those who do not fit into the normal categories. · Tackling disadvantage should be more positive and impactful, making sure services and society does include everyone. People are disadvantaged by the system, rather than being disadvantaged by their characteristics · Systems need to include and work for everyone, rather than viewing those at risk of disadvantage as outsiders, or as failing, who need to be helped to fit in to the current system · A sense of belonging is essential
· Hearing and responding to the voice of the under-served is essential. · Services must rethink the way they communicate · Involve communities at the beginning of discussions about what they need and how services might be changing. · We want an approach which aims for inclusive systems that do not disadvantage anyone, and the language and images used should match this approach
· Creating a sustainable future is essential for us all, but especially for those who are at increased risk of disadvantage · Supporting families at risk of disadvantage better is an essential element of the proposed Early Help transformation by developing Family Hubs · Brighton & Hove’s involvement in the Supporting Families Programme is a key part of how to better improve the lives of families at risk of disadvantage and we must continue to support the outcomes of this programme
· For families with multiple problems an integrated “whole family” approach which recognises and deals with their interconnected problems is most effective · Whole family working means transforming services from a number of unconnected professionals with their own assessments, thresholds and measures to integrated, family-focussed, outcome-based working · Whole family working will improve outcomes for families and reduce the demand on costly specialist services · Services should explore more options for appropriate collection, recording, sharing and analysis of data
|
4 |
Data – what city-wide data on the risks of disadvantage looks like
Our intention within this framework is to better describe the breadth and depth of the risks of disadvantage faced by families and to use data to inform this. Our intention during 2023 is to work closely alongside the emerging Supporting Families Programme outcomes framework to identify, collect, analyse and present data around a range of risk factors affecting families.
National context
There are several national workstreams we are involved in to help local authorities make better use of data and there is a particular focus on early help data within that.
Data systems, processes and information flows have been highlighted nationally as underdeveloped in Children and Family Services and this is reflected locally. Commitment to data transformation is fundamental to embedding sustainable improvements in terms of seamless support for families, better information for practitioners, and targeting resources appropriately and efficiently. Developing data maturity is also a requirement of continued funding for the Supporting Families Programme.
Common challenges to this work have been identified, and include:
· Difficulties in agreeing a definition of early help
· Different areas interpreting and implementing early help in different ways
· Case management systems not fit for purpose and too reliant on individuals
· Complexity in evidencing outcomes accurately, meaningfully or consistently
· Too much emphasis on this being a problem for local authorities to resolve, it needs a partnership approach
Local context
Locally, needs analysis indicate that for children in families facing multiple disadvantage, the outcomes gap in the city is growing. This overarching ‘A Fairer Brighton & Hove’ Framework seeks to bring together learning from the range of local initiatives to tackle disadvantage, with delivery through the proposed Family Hubs. This requires joining up data sources for improved data analysis and robust data governance. The findings of the Early Help review in the City (2020-2022) also state that:
· Rationalisation and further integration of information systems across the partnership would significantly improve the whole family approach
· Improved data analysis will enhance strategic and operational decision making, help frontline practitioners better understand outcomes, improve service offer
· Multiple systems are used across services and organisations and there are currently no mechanisms for data sharing and providing a single view across systems.
The Access to Data project within the City Council is seeking to identify a wide range of data sources for children, young people and families and use that to establish fuller key data sharing agreements and arrangements. This is aligned to what is needed for the Supporting Families outcomes framework. Some of the issues include:
· Some of the indicators for the outcomes framework are complex and require multiple data sources to answer, with data being held in different locations and formats
· It will take time and greater understanding to know if all data is usable, even if it is readily available
· Data is not always available in reportable formats, therefore further manual work is needed to extract useful information, which is highly inefficient
· Across Families, Children and Learning, the Council and our partners, data is stored and accessed in a variety of ways. This means that there is no one ‘data extraction’ solution that will work for all
In order to progress this work, an FCL Data Governance Board is being established, which will link with both the corporate BHCC Data Governance Board, Family Hubs Transformation Board and with partnership groups looking at data locally. This board will ensure that:
· FCL is part of an organisation-wide approach to data and insight
· Understanding local needs and landscape through data to ensure informed decisions re finance, operations, interventions
· Develop and embed a data culture to improve use of data and digital resources
· Reduce siloed working, inefficiencies and duplication in terms of reporting and case management systems
· Robust data sharing to reduce risk to children and young people
· Joined up approach to performance reporting
Subject to the challenges outlined above, work is underway to build a strong local data set matched against the Supporting Families outcomes framework. Below is a summary of the objectives and data we are looking to collect within that, and examples of the outcomes it aims to support.
In future updates of this report we intend to share more high level data to demonstrate the current breadth and range of who is at risk of disadvantage within the city.
The next phase of the Supporting Families programme has two key ambitions:
1. To see vulnerable families thrive, building their resilience by providing effective, whole family support to help prevent escalation into statutory services. 2. To drive system change locally and nationally, working with local authorities and their partners to create joined up local services, able to identify families in need, provide the right support at the right time, and track their outcomes in the long term.
This outcomes framework sets out the data requirements Local Authorities are asked to collect and report on as of October 2022. This is an ambitious piece of work given the complexity of our data systems and arrangements. However, this work will enable us to have a better and more comprehensive view on the breadth and depth of disadvantage in the city. It will also enable us to better understand the impact of our work with families and better understand the problems faced by families with multiple disadvantage risk factors.
The Supporting Families Programme 2022 - 2025 outcomes framework will be looking at:
Getting a good education Improving and sustaining school attendance and improved engagement with education (e.g., pupils no longer on report, reduction/no detentions)
Good early years development Ensuring families are engaged with appropriate support that can be seen to be making a difference; capacity for positive, effective parenting increased and they are accessing and engaging with services and that children have the right support to make progress and that their needs are met
Improved Mental and Physical Health Mental health/wellbeing/physical health is improved, and family members are better equipped to manage this and the right support is in place
Promoting Recovery and Reducing Harm from Substance Use A reduction or abstinence from substance use and families better equipped to manage or to find alternative coping strategies, and understands risk / impact of substance use
Improved Family Relationships Family members understand behaviours, develop coping mechanisms and better at self-managing. Family relationships improve. Support improves for young carers
Children Safe from Abuse and Exploitation Strategies developed with children and families to reduce harm such as abuse, neglect, missing episodes, exploitation.
Crime Prevention and Tackling Crime A reduction or absence of family members being involved in crime or anti-social behalf. Young people better supported to manage risks
Safe from Domestic Abuse Domestic abuse is reduced or eliminated with safety plans in place and appropriate support being given.
Secure Housing Increase in families having sustained accommodation or more moves into settled housing. Reduction in young people at risk of homelessness.
Financial Stability More adult family members in work or making progress to work, families feel more able to manage finances including reduction in debt. Increase in young people in education, employment or training. |
5 |
Update on ‘Year 1 strategies’
Year 1 of the Fairer Brighton & Hove Framework will focus on the strategic areas of work covered below. It is important to note that the list below is by no means a full look at the work supporting those at risk of disadvantage across the city. It is intended to provide a focussed and targeted list to work with in Year 1, to test this new Framework and provide learning before expanding into Year 2. The intention is that this Framework will become more scalable in Years 2 and 3 and will link with a wider group of partners and stakeholders in the city. Year 1 is about setting out and developing the principles and testing the proposed mechanism for providing a collective oversight on the progress of these areas of work.
The Strategy for Tackling Educational Disadvantage
Groups have been formed to work on each strategy strand and are meeting regularly. Connections have been made with the universities, post-16's and other groups such as Uni-Connect, who are contributing to the development of the strategy. We have a young person representative on the group who links to pupil voice. Recent work includes:
· A training programme has taken place in partnership with the Durrington Research School and the Education Endowment Foundation, which 13 schools have been involved in. The impact has improved outcomes for disadvantaged pupils across all primary measures (secondary data is not available yet) of achievement (when compared with disadvantaged outcomes within the city/nationally). For example, in KS2 the percentage of pupils achieving the expected standard in reading, writing and maths is 1.4% higher than the national average for this group. Following a success of this project a further 15 schools have been recruited, while the 13 have progressed onto a second phase with ongoing support. · An extensive offer for both primary reading (including Every Child a reader) and maths interventions has been developed and delivered across the LA supporting accelerated progress in both subjects. Several new school-led reading pilot projects have taken place in the last year to support primary reading. These opportunities are now being shared at Headteacher meetings to widen the impact. · A transition programme from Year 6 to Year 7 has been developed to support disadvantaged pupils. It includes working on approaches to teaching reading within secondary schools based on the successful intervention programmes already being delivered in the primary phase · Working in partnership with the secondary school maths leads, a programme is being developed to support teachers to more effectively teach and plan for pupils working below the expected standard, through sharing best primary school practice. · Assessment and planning tools have been developed to support disadvantaged pupils working below the programme of study. These have been based on the very successful Planning to Progress documents developed during the pandemic. They identified the key learning in each phase allowing teachers to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils who are behind their peers. · Audit tools are being further developed to support leaders at all levels (including governors and School Partnership Advisers) to carry out in depth analysis of provision for disadvantaged learners. · Work is happening in partnership with the Secondary School Partnership to reduce exclusions across the city, learning from the zero-exclusion model being delivered at Patcham High School. · The secondary school partnership (10 schools) now have a joint key performance indicator on disadvantage seeking to work together to improve outcomes
Moving forward, we have planned
Governor and Headteacher conferences using keynote speakers who are
leading nationally in this field
|
6 A focus on….School Attendance
Reflections, recommendations and next steps
Reflections: It has been a complicated task to bring together a collated look at this work with families at risk of disadvantage. Whilst the data sharing work continues, this first update report is more of a step towards the position we hope to be in for future reports.
However, the past six months collaboration on this Framework has resulted in: · Strategy leads working together on considering the cumulative impact of both the risk of disadvantage and their work to mitigate it · A reflection on and am example given on how the emerging guiding principles can be applied to ‘real life’ in practice · An understanding that we do not want to simply repeat data / updates that appear elsewhere, but to use this framework to enable a new insightful look at the experiences of families in the city.
|
Recommendations: · Return to the communities that provided feedback earlier in 2022 and check the framework is aligned to their views and experiences · Continue to explore and expand new and different ways to hear from families at risk of disadvantage. Suggestions have included specific activities around working with Black young people involved in the Extended Adolescent Service; exploring opportunities via the Holiday Activities and Food Programme, especially for children and young people with SEND; working with the city’s Care Leavers Forum and Youth Council. · Fund engagement work with young people around school attendance to fully understand the barriers that young people and their families face in attending school, coproducing work to in order to support and address the barriers for attendance, especially for those most at risk of disadvantage. To include a focus on where attendance has become a concern post pandemic. · Ensure the feedback received from communities within this framework is shared with the Family Hubs design phase. · Recommend that the digital offer in Family Hubs is wide and includes the cultural ‘what’s available’ elements of city-life to ensure greater equity of access to events and opportunities · Families, Children and Learning to develop a coproduction strategy to enable all services to work to a best practice model and learn from previous work such as Home to School Transport · Families, Children and Learning to meet with other directorate management teams within the council to raise awareness and explore the areas of work that should be covered by this framework during year two. · Work with the University of Sussex and Public Health to further analyse and learn from the 2021 Safe and Well at School Survey · Explore mentoring opportunities for young people at risk of disadvantage · Make further connections between ‘A Fairer Brighton & Hove’ and anti-poverty work in the city especially within children’s social work · Expand and explore more data opportunities including working with Public Health and linking with existing and emerging data dashboards such as those used by the SEND Partnership Board and the Brighton & Hove Safeguarding Children Partnership
|
Next steps: Actions will be progressed and a further update will be brought to the Family Hubs Transformation Board and Children, Young People and Skills Committee in May/June 2023. This will summarise findings from year one of the framework and look ahead to what will be covered in year two.
The next report will also present a fuller range of data around disadvantage in the city and look more at the ways in which families may face multiple barriers and what we are doing to address that.
The Framework will be published in an accessible format, available for all to review, comment on and contribute to its further development.
|